Monthly Archives: January 2010

Organisations deemed subversive by Iran

Iranian Intelligence Minister Heidar Moslehi says dozens of foreign organizations that attempted to create havoc in the Islamic Republic have been identified.

http://www.presstv.ir/classic/detail.aspx?id=114435&sectionid=351020101

80 have been identified, 60 are listed below.

1. The Soros Foundation,
2. The Woodrow Wilson Centre
3. The Freedom House
4. The National Endowment for Democracy (NED)
5. The National Democratic Institute (NDI)
6. The National Republican Institute (NRI)
7. The Institute for Democracy in Eastern Europe (based in Warsaw)
8. The East European Democratic Centre (EEDC)
9. The Ford Foundation
10. Rockefeller Brothers Fund
11. The Hoover Institution, Stanford University
12. The Dutch HIVOS Foundation
13. UK’s MENAS
14. The United Nations Association of the USA
15. The Carnegie Foundation
16. UK’s Wilton Park
17. The Search for Common Ground Organization
18. The Population Council
19. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
20. The Aspen Institute
21. The American Enterprise Institute
22. The New American Foundation
23. The Smith Richardson Foundation
24. The German Marshall Fund (with offices in Germany, Belgium )
25. The Centre for Peaceful Solutions
26. The Abdolrahman Boroumand Foundation
27. The University of Yale
28. The Meridian International Centre
29. The Foundation for Democracy in Iran
30. The International Republican Institute
31. The National Democratic Institute
32. The American Innovation Institute
33. The Institute for Democracy in Eastern Europe [presumably a repeat]
34. The USAID
35. Center for International Private Enterprise
36. American Center for International Labor Solidarity
37. The International Centre for Democratic Transition (ICDT)
38. Association for Union Democracy [Persian: Anjoman-e Tashakkol-e democracy]
39. The Albert Einstein Institution
40. The World Movement for Democracy
41. The Young Activists Network
42. The Democracy Intelligence Group and IT [name as published]
43. The International Movement of Parliamentarians for Democracy (IMPD)
44. The Network of Democracy Research Institutes
45. The Rega [or Riga] Institution
46. The Berkman Center
47. The American Council on Foreign Relations
48. Germany’s Foreign Policy Association
49. Israeli Memri centre
50. The University of Yale and all its affiliations
51. The British Centre for Democratic Studies
52. The Meridian International Institute
53. The American National Defence Academy
54. The Iran Human Rights Documentation Center
55. The American FLTA Centre in Central Asia, Caucasus [name as published]
56. The Committee on the Present Danger
57. The Brookings Institution
58. The Saban Center for Middle East Policy – Brookings Institution
59. The Human Rights Watch
60. The New America Foundation

Source: http://www.akhbar-rooz.com/news.jsp?essayId=26259

Iraq Oil Exports up by 4%

Iraq Dec Oil Exports Up 4% On Month At 1.977 Million B/D

http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=201001040338dowjonesdjonline000062&title=iraq-dec-oil-exports-up-4on-month-at-1977-million-b/d

Iraq’s crude oil exports in December were up 4% at 1.977 million barrels a day, compared with 1.902 million barrels a day in November, an Iraqi oil industry source said Monday.

He said that Iraq exported in December an average of 1.534 million barrels a day from the southern Basra oil terminal, up from 1.498 million barrels a day in November.

Some 433,000 barrels a day were exported from Kirkuk oil fields in northern Iraq via the Turkish port of Ceyhan. The remaining 10,000 barrels a day were exported to Jordan via trucks, he added.

Iraq’s crude oil exports have slowed down below the 2 million barrels-a-day target since September due to attacks on the northern export pipeline. In December, an attack on the pipeline suspended exports via the northern pipeline for a few days. Similar attacks took place in October and September. Iraq usually exports 480,000 barrels a day via that pipeline.

Sadrist Bloc becomes the Free People Bloc

The Sadrist Bloc will run in the upcoming parliamentary elections as the Free People Bloc (Al-Ahrar Bloc); the bloc is made up of other independent candidates and not just those from the Sadrist trend. The head of the bloc is Nassar al-Rubay’i. The Sadrists presented their democratic colourings when they held primary elections back in October, the so far only party to do so in Iraq.

Iraq oil minister Hussain al-Shahristani under fire

Hussain al-Shahristani is under fire for attempting to replace the current director of the Iraqi North Oil Company with an aide of his who, ostensibly, is a loyal political and economic partner.

Staff at North Oil threatened to go on strike and halt oil production if he goes ahead. According to Dubai’s Al-Sharqiyah, North Oil employees criticised Shahristani for appointing his own, personal, aides in the oil ministry and Iraq’s oil companies for the purposes of influencing the country’s oil contracts and revenues for personal and party-political purposes.

The Iraq National Oil Company (INOC) was founded in 1966 by the Iraqi government. It was empowered to operate all aspects of the oil industry in Iraq except for refining which was already being run by the Oil Refineries Administration (1952) and local distribution which was also already under government control.

Iraq to have media city

The Baghdad government recently announced plans to build a media centre in the city which will contain TV producing centers, news channels centers, filming studios, producing services centers, and hotels for foreign journalists. More information can be found here

However:

    According to Arab media reports, the Transparency League, a monitoring committee in Iraq, has warned that the project will be a “prison” that restricts press and other freedoms. A statement from the organisation, says news channels, states that security agencies do not want the public to know of human rights violations, the failure of government and security agencies, and the corruption of ministries and senior officials.

Peter Galbraith statement on activities in Kurdistan

A Statement on My Activities in Kurdistan
Peter W. Galbraith

http://blogs.nybooks.com/post/287979881/a-statement-on-my-activities-in-kurdistan

Recent reports on my activities in Kurdistan call for a response. I have been both a writer on Iraq and an active participant in events there. After being an eyewitness to Saddam Hussein’s genocide against the Kurds in the 1980s, I came to the view that the Iraqi Kurdish aspiration for independence was morally justified and the only sure means of protecting the Kurdish people. In late 2003 and early 2004, I helped Kurdistan’s leaders draft a proposal for a self-governing Kurdistan that was submitted to the Coalition Provisional Authority on February 11, 2004, for inclusion in Iraq’s interim constitution. Under the proposal, Kurdistan had its own government and military, Kurdistan law prevailed over Iraqi law, and Kurdistan controlled its own natural resources, including oil.

As Kurdistan’s leaders recognized, legal control over oil meant nothing unless there was a Kurdistan oil industry. In June 2004, I helped bring DNO, a Norwegian oil company, into Kurdistan. I was paid by DNO and entered into a financial arrangement with the company through a Delaware partnership, Porcupine LP. That year DNO discovered oil in Kurdistan and its pioneering efforts have attracted more than thirty other companies, creating a robust Kurdistan oil industry and giving the Kurds the financial basis for meaningful self-government.

In the summer of 2005, Kurdistan’s leaders asked me to advise them on the negotiations for the permanent constitution. Their proposal was identical to the one they made in February 2004 and they achieved virtually all of it. In its November 12, 2009 article, The New York Times says that I “pushed through” these constitutional provisions for my own benefit. The Times gave no source for this allegation and its reporter never asked me about it.

As even a superficial analysis would show, the allegation could not possibly be true. I was a private citizen, unconnected to any government and with no power to push through anything. I was not directly involved in any negotiations and was not in the room when they took place. I simply provided advice, unpaid and on an informal basis, to the Kurdish leaders, who knew of my arrangements with DNO when they asked for my advice. The Kurds, who had been fighting for independence or autonomy for eighty years, had set the agenda and they pushed through their own proposals. Although the Times asserts that my relationship with DNO was largely undeclared, it was also known to the US and Iraqi governments and I represented the company on a joint committee with the Iraqi Ministry of Oil.

A separate issue arises over what I should have disclosed in connection with my articles in The New York Review of Books. I discussed Kurdistan’s autonomy proposals, including those on oil, in a piece written in March 2004 entitled “How to Get Out of Iraq.” At this time, I did not have any business relationships. Subsequently, I wrote several other articles in 2004 and 2005, some of which briefly discussed the oil issue, and did not mention my business arrangements. These arrangements were covered by confidentiality agreements, but I should have stated that I had business interests in Kurdistan. I regret not having done so and apologize to the editors and readers of The New York Review of Books. In my later articles, I did state that I was “a principal at the Windham Resources Group, a firm that negotiates on behalf of its clients in post-conflict societies, including in Iraq.”

In June 2009, I joined the United Nations as deputy special representative of the secretary-general in Afghanistan. At that time, I terminated all my business activities. Neither I nor Porcupine LP has any ongoing contractual relationship or financial arrangement with DNO. We do not hold an interest in any Iraqi oil field. Porcupine is the plaintiff in an arbitration with DNO related to past disputes from which I may or may not benefit. When I was appointed to the UN position, I disclosed all my financial interests, including those related to the Porcupine-DNO arbitration.

This statement appears in the January 14, 2010 issue of The New York Review of Books.